RESPONSE TO IAN ANDERSON @ KINDER MORGAN

REVERSE ONUS APPLIED BY CROWN CANADA
Syllabus Addendum : Risk Benefit Analysis 
Dec 3rd 2014
You have invited public comment - and, we reply

Apparently, Kinder-Morgan considers First Nations or Original indigenous Peoples of Turtle Island North "consultation" as being mere patronization; rather than genuine respect / siem'stum.

This absence of respect is rooted within the cellars of the continued colonial attitude of "the doctrine of discovery"; where, indigenous Peoples are defined by the Holy See Papal Bulls of Terra Nullius and the Supremacy Acts of the UK.

Kinder-Morgan would do well to seek legal counsel advice on the matters of collaboration with the Crown Canada in matters of infringement of the UN Charter, Chapter VII provisions. In short, if you look around, these west coast lands are non-treatied; sovereign since before 11,000 years ago. Ignoring this fact; and, not recognizing the preference issues of trade relations versus treaty under the terms and conditions as prescribed by these governing , indigenous Peoples will inevitably cause your stakeholders economic harm.

Simply put, the Crown Canada National Energy Board does not possess jurisdiction in these non-treatied territories by virtue of the international standards of Free Prior Informed Consent. Trespass is a violation of the UN Charter; and, subject to sanctions under Chapter VII - illicit hostile military occupation in absence of specific UN Security Council sanction. Your activities may be subject to seizure for trespass.

Thank You / Huy'ch'qu'
1.778.433.3908